Kim Jong-un Reiterates Openness to Nuclear Talks with U.S.

On September 22, 2025, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un reiterated his willingness to engage in nuclear talks with the U.S., but only if Washington abandons its demand for North Korean denuclearization.

Kim Jong-un Reiterates Openness to Nuclear Talks with U.S.
nknews.org

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un declared on September 22, 2025, that he remains open to dialogue with the United States, provided that Washington drops its longstanding demand for North Korea to relinquish its nuclear arsenal. The statement, delivered during a session of the Supreme People's Assembly and reported by North Korean state media, marks a rare public overture from Pyongyang amid heightened regional tensions and ongoing international sanctions.

Conditions for Dialogue and Historical Context

Kim Jong-un’s remarks emphasized that any future talks with the U.S. hinge on a fundamental shift in Washington’s approach. He insisted that the U.S. must "accept reality" and abandon its insistence on North Korean denuclearization, a position that has been the primary obstacle in previous negotiations. Kim recalled his three high-profile meetings with U.S. President Donald Trump during Trump’s first term, including the unprecedented 2018 Singapore summit, the 2019 Hanoi summit, and a symbolic encounter at the Korean Demilitarized Zone. While the Singapore summit produced a vague commitment to denuclearization, subsequent talks collapsed over irreconcilable differences, with both sides blaming each other for the failure to reach a substantive agreement.

Since the breakdown of talks in 2019, North Korea has repeatedly declared itself an "irreversible nuclear state" and has categorically rejected any possibility of giving up its nuclear weapons. Kim cited the fate of other countries that surrendered their nuclear programs under U.S. pressure as a cautionary tale, warning that denuclearization is not an option for Pyongyang. He argued that international sanctions have only strengthened North Korea’s resilience and self-reliance, rather than compelling it to change course.

Regional Dynamics and Shifting Alliances

While Kim expressed a conditional openness to talks with the U.S., he was unequivocal in his refusal to engage with South Korea, despite recent overtures from Seoul aimed at reducing tensions. North Korea has escalated its hostility toward the South, declaring it a "principal enemy" and severing key transportation links. This hardline stance comes as Pyongyang has deepened its strategic partnership with Russia, reportedly sending troops and weaponry to support Moscow’s ongoing war in Ukraine. In return, North Korea has secured critical backing from Russia, including a mutual defense agreement signed during Russian President Vladimir Putin’s visit to Pyongyang in 2024.

South Korean officials have voiced concerns that Moscow’s support for North Korea may extend to the transfer of advanced military technology, further complicating the security landscape on the Korean Peninsula. The growing alignment between North Korea and Russia, coupled with Pyongyang’s intransigence on the nuclear issue, poses significant challenges for U.S. and allied efforts to contain North Korea’s weapons programs and maintain stability in Northeast Asia.

International Response and Prospects for Negotiation

The international community remains deeply skeptical of North Korea’s intentions, given its track record of using talks to extract concessions while continuing to advance its nuclear and missile capabilities. Independent analysts note that Kim’s latest overture appears designed to shift blame for the diplomatic impasse onto Washington, while reinforcing North Korea’s status as a nuclear power. U.S. officials have yet to respond publicly to Kim’s remarks, but previous administrations have maintained that any meaningful dialogue must include a credible commitment to denuclearization.

As the standoff persists, the prospects for renewed negotiations remain uncertain. Observers caution that without a significant change in either side’s position, the cycle of provocation, sanctions, and stalled diplomacy is likely to continue, with potentially grave consequences for regional and global security.

Sources