Pakistan Evacuates 100,000 Over Flooding Threat
Pakistan has evacuated more than 100,000 people from Sindh province as floodwaters threaten communities following heavy monsoon rains and dam releases from India.

Authorities in Pakistan’s southern Sindh province have evacuated over 100,000 residents from low-lying areas along the Indus River, responding to an escalating flood threat fueled by weeks of intense monsoon rains and the release of water from Indian dams. The mass evacuation, confirmed by Sindh Information Minister Sharjeel Memon, comes amid warnings from India of potential cross-border flooding, which were communicated through diplomatic channels.
The crisis is part of a broader disaster that has gripped Pakistan since late June. According to disaster officials, nearly 1,000 people have died nationwide due to flooding, and more than 1.8 million have been displaced in Punjab province alone. The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) reports that thousands of rescuers, backed by the military, are delivering food and providing shelter to those affected, particularly in Muzaffargarh and Multan districts, where 3,900 villages have been inundated.
Cross-Border Tensions and Data Disputes
The situation has been exacerbated by strained relations between Pakistan and India over water management. India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty in April, following a deadly attack in Kashmir, and has since limited the detail of river data shared with Pakistan. Pakistani officials have accused India of violating international law by bypassing the treaty’s established communication channels and instead issuing flood warnings through diplomatic missions. While India maintains that it continues to share high flood data on humanitarian grounds, Pakistani authorities argue that the information is insufficient for effective disaster response.
This diplomatic friction has complicated relief efforts, with Pakistani officials repeatedly urging India to fully comply with the treaty’s provisions. The lack of detailed, timely data has made it more difficult for Pakistani authorities to anticipate and manage the flow of floodwaters from the Ravi, Sutlej, and Chenab rivers, all of which originate in India and have reached dangerous levels this season.
Humanitarian Response and Propaganda Concerns
On the ground, the humanitarian response has been extensive but challenged by the scale of the disaster. Relief camps have been established in safer locations, and rescue and health teams have been deployed throughout flood-prone districts. The military’s involvement has been heavily publicized in local media, with official statements emphasizing the readiness and effectiveness of armed forces in rescue operations. This narrative, while highlighting genuine efforts, also serves to bolster the government’s image amid criticism of disaster preparedness and infrastructure resilience.
International humanitarian organizations, including the International Rescue Committee, report that over 100,000 people have been directly affected in Sindh, with thousands of homes destroyed. The European Union’s humanitarian monitoring confirms the severity of the crisis and the urgent need for continued aid, particularly as heavy rains are forecast to persist in the coming days.
Historical Context and Ongoing Risks
Sindh was among the worst-hit regions during the catastrophic 2022 floods, which killed more than 1,700 people nationwide. The current flooding has revived fears of a repeat disaster, especially as climate change continues to intensify monsoon patterns and increase the frequency of extreme weather events. Pakistani officials warn that the Indus River at Guddu is expected to reach high to very high flood levels, with further evacuations likely if conditions worsen.
While official statements from both Pakistan and India stress humanitarian considerations, the ongoing dispute over water data and the use of emotionally charged language in some state media highlight the political undercurrents shaping the crisis response. Independent reporting from international and local outlets remains crucial for verifying claims and countering potential propaganda or misinformation.